<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Autopano Pro tested in Image &#038; Nature magazine</title>
	<link>http://www.autopano.net/blog/2008/03/14/autopano-pro-image-nature-magazine/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 10:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim Dolan</title>
		<link>http://www.autopano.net/blog/2008/03/14/autopano-pro-image-nature-magazine/#comment-180</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Dolan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 22:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.autopano.net/blog/2008/03/14/autopano-pro-image-nature-magazine/#comment-180</guid>
		<description>I too did a review of four pano programs and concluded that autopano pro exceeded the others in almost every instance.  Good job.  I wrote a several page report on this review with photos and if you would like it just ask and I'll send it to you. I was hoping to publish it at Naturescapes.net but there was a conflict and it didn't get done.  However I notice others have caught on there and they are using autopano pro anyway. 

Jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too did a review of four pano programs and concluded that autopano pro exceeded the others in almost every instance.  Good job.  I wrote a several page report on this review with photos and if you would like it just ask and I&#8217;ll send it to you. I was hoping to publish it at Naturescapes.net but there was a conflict and it didn&#8217;t get done.  However I notice others have caught on there and they are using autopano pro anyway. </p>
<p>Jim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
