My Autopano Pro forum

Sharing knowledge around Autopano

You are not logged in.

Announcement

The documentation of AutoPano Pro can be found online at our Wiki. Before posting a question, please check with the manual and read the posting guidelines!

#801 2009-01-18 22:16:07

fma38
Moderator
From: Grenoble, France
Registered: 2005-12-07
Posts: 4842
Website

Re: [papywizard v1] Annoncement, feedback, bug report

Andrew, no, the shutter is triggered *after* the stabilization delay (and during the same delay, if the mirror lockup feature is activated). Then, the shutter is triggered during the 'time value' param. And the complete sequence starts again for bracketing. As we didn't move, we just launch the mirror lockup feature immediatly.

It is possible to activate the multi-shots program, with the bracketing, so, by holding down the shutter button, the n bracketed pictures are taken. So, you can just give a 'time value' long enough to complete this sequence. But it is not a good idea, as only 1 shot will be recorded in the xml data file.

For the rest, your description is ok.

bigwade, I'm looking for a solution to create a documentation which can be on the wiki, as pdf or html, and which can be embedded in Papywizard, so you can read the manual on the field.

You can try this tool, to make a pdf from the Papywizard wiki:

http://www.easysw.com/htmldoc/pdf-o-matic.php

Just give the wiki page...


Frédéric

Canon 20D + 17-40/f4 L USM + 70-200/f4 L USM + 50/f1.4 USM + Tokina 10-17 3.5-4.5 AF DX Fisheye
Merlin/Orion panohead + Papywizard on Nokia N800 and HP TC-1100

Offline

 

#802 2009-01-18 22:43:19

Paul
Member
From: Bonn, Germany
Registered: 2008-08-30
Posts: 679

Re: [papywizard v1] Annoncement, feedback, bug report

fma38 wrote:

So, you can just give a 'time value' long enough to complete this sequence.

Frederic, I am little disturbed about "time value".

Is it the only the duration of the trigger signal, as I read it out of your quoted post or is it the summed time about the entire shooting process as you wrote in TipsAndTricks?

The timeValue param should be computed so that the entire shooting sequence can complete. This includes:

    * AF cycle
    * if mirror lockup flag is not set, time for mirror to lockup
    * exposure time
    * time for mirror to go back to initial position
    * time for writing buffer image to card

The last 2 sequences can be included in the next move, but be sure that the camera is ready when the next shoot sequence begins!

Last edited by Paul (2009-01-18 22:43:47)


Paul

close, but no cigar ... ... ...

Online

 

#803 2009-01-18 22:50:15

mediavets
Member
From: Isleham, Cambridgeshire, UK.
Registered: 2007-11-14
Posts: 3778
Website

Re: [papywizard v1] Annoncement, feedback, bug report

fma38 wrote:

Andrew, no, the shutter is triggered *after* the stabilization delay (and during the same delay, if the mirror lockup feature is activated). Then, the shutter is triggered during the 'time value' param. And the complete sequence starts again for bracketing. As we didn't move, we just launch the mirror lockup feature immediatly.

It is possible to activate the multi-shots program, with the bracketing, so, by holding down the shutter button, the n bracketed pictures are taken. So, you can just give a 'time value' long enough to complete this sequence. But it is not a good idea, as only 1 shot will be recorded in the xml data file.

For the rest, your description is ok.

Frederic,

Yes, I know the shutter is triggered after the Stabilization delay (if no Mirror lockup is set).

What I'm trying to get at is precisely when - in relation to start of Stabilization delay interval and before shutter is triggered by second closure of the contact switch - the switch contact is closed to invoke miror lockup if mirror lock up is set.

I don't have a camera with mirror lockup capability so I don't know how it works when a users operates the camera manually - perhaps you can explain that too - does the user have to press the shutter button twice when using mirror lockup?

If my camera had mirror lock up I could check experimentally how it operates under Papywizard control - but I can't - and I wish to document some of this for others - that's why I want to understand it and get a complete and accurate description.

My Nikon D40 doesn't have AEB either (nor does the D40X or D60). Do all DSLRs with AEB allow the user to chose whether to use one shutter press or multiple shutter presses when using AEB?

Last edited by mediavets (2009-01-18 22:51:23)


Andrew Stephens
Nikon D40, Nikkor 10.5mm fisheye, Sigma 8mm f3.5 fisheye, Nikkor 18-55/50/35mm  lenses, Nodal Ninja 5 Lite, Agno's Mrotator TCSshort
Nikon P5100, CP5000, CP995, FC-E8, WC-E63,WC-E68, TC-E2, Kaidan Kiwi 995, Bophoto pano bracket
Merlin/Orion panohead + Papywizard on Nokia 770/N800 and Windows XP/2K

Offline

 

#804 2009-01-18 23:29:53

klausesser
Member
From: Düsseldorf, Germany
Registered: 2006-05-22
Posts: 1991
Website

Re: [papywizard v1] Annoncement, feedback, bug report

fma38 wrote:

Please, read all the documentations:

http://trac.gbiloba.org/papywizard/wiki/UserGuide
http://trac.gbiloba.org/papywizard/wiki … ngsequence

There is no way to know what is the exposure time set in the camera; it is up to the user to tell Papywizard what value has be set on the camera. If this value varies between bracketing, just use the longer value.

It will be easier to manage in tethered mode, but it is not the case now.

The 'bracketing intent' is just an information which is recorded in the xml data file.

About translations, if you have a doubt, have a look at the screenshots: they are taken in english, so you can retreive the original name.

Hii Frédéric!

Yes - i see. Guessed it already. cool

best, Klaus

P.S.: i didn´t know about the "TipsAndTricks" . . i must confess . . . neutral

Last edited by klausesser (2009-01-18 23:32:12)

Offline

 

#805 2009-01-18 23:34:52

klausesser
Member
From: Düsseldorf, Germany
Registered: 2006-05-22
Posts: 1991
Website

Re: [papywizard v1] Annoncement, feedback, bug report

mediavets wrote:

Klaus,

Here's what I see when experimenting - in this instance it's helpful to have an IR LED shutter trigger because I can watch the LED flash.

Hi Andrew!

Thanks for your explanation! I didn´t look close enough to the whole thing - was a bit in a hurry these days . .
Where would i be without yours and Freds help . . . wink

best to you, Klaus

Offline

 

#806 2009-01-18 23:51:40

fma38
Moderator
From: Grenoble, France
Registered: 2005-12-07
Posts: 4842
Website

Re: [papywizard v1] Annoncement, feedback, bug report

Paul, what I mean is that the 'time value' param set in Papywizard must be longer or equal that the entire camera shooting sequence, as I described it. It means that you don't just need to put exactly the same value as the Tv value of the camera, but add a few ms for the rest of the sequence (mirror up/down, writing CF and so).

Andrew, yes, when you set the mirror lockup, you have to trigger the shutter twice. That is what Papywizar does. The first trigger duration (to lockup the mirror) is 'stab. delay', the second is 'time value'. In fact, we should need just a pulse, then wait stab delay, then another pulse, then wait 'time value' delay. But I don't know what value to put for the pusle; it will depend on cameras, I guess. Si, I put the pulse equal as the delays...

I will try to make a chronogram...


Frédéric

Canon 20D + 17-40/f4 L USM + 70-200/f4 L USM + 50/f1.4 USM + Tokina 10-17 3.5-4.5 AF DX Fisheye
Merlin/Orion panohead + Papywizard on Nokia N800 and HP TC-1100

Offline

 

#807 2009-01-19 00:15:11

klausesser
Member
From: Düsseldorf, Germany
Registered: 2006-05-22
Posts: 1991
Website

Re: [papywizard v1] Annoncement, feedback, bug report

I set a mosaic this way:

3x2 pictures bracketed
stab delay 0,5 sec.
TimeValue 10.0
Mirror lockup

Camera was set to -2/0/+2
"center time" was 3 sec.

problem: the camera started the 2nd picture before the head moved to the 2nd position . .

"effektive" exposure-times are:
0,75/3/12sec. That means that the head should have moved BEFORE the 2nd picture before the camera should have been fired.

I set time value to 12. Now it fits. head moves only after camera shot the last picture (12sec) of the bracket-set.

BUT: Papy waits 12sec at ALL exposure-times. That means it waits 12 sec even after the 0,75sec bracket before it fires the 3sec bracket. Then waits 12sec before shooting the 12sec bracket, then waits 12 sec before moving to the next position . . (wich is correct)

Seems to be no way to change that behaviour. It would be fine if it could match the time-value to the real exposure time. As an example Tv could be x% of the real exposure time at the bracket exposure.

So when you shoot a 3/6/12 set time-value would be 3,5/6,5/12,5sec before the next shutter-release resp. move to the next position . . . ? While stab-delay always is 0,5sec. after each mirror-lockup.


Waiting 12 secs. after shooting a 0,75sec bracket and a 3sec bracket wastes much time . . . cool

Last edited by klausesser (2009-01-19 00:25:29)

Offline

 

#808 2009-01-19 00:26:54

fma38
Moderator
From: Grenoble, France
Registered: 2005-12-07
Posts: 4842
Website

Re: [papywizard v1] Annoncement, feedback, bug report

I agree this is not great. We need to improve that for v2 (do no hesitate to propose ideas on the Open talk thread).


Frédéric

Canon 20D + 17-40/f4 L USM + 70-200/f4 L USM + 50/f1.4 USM + Tokina 10-17 3.5-4.5 AF DX Fisheye
Merlin/Orion panohead + Papywizard on Nokia N800 and HP TC-1100

Offline

 

#809 2009-01-19 00:46:56

mediavets
Member
From: Isleham, Cambridgeshire, UK.
Registered: 2007-11-14
Posts: 3778
Website

Re: [papywizard v1] Annoncement, feedback, bug report

fma38 wrote:

Andrew, yes, when you set the mirror lockup, you have to trigger the shutter twice. That is what Papywizar does. The first trigger duration (to lockup the mirror) is 'stab. delay', the second is 'time value'. In fact, we should need just a pulse, then wait stab delay, then another pulse, then wait 'time value' delay. But I don't know what value to put for the pusle; it will depend on cameras, I guess. Si, I put the pulse equal as the delays...

I will try to make a chronogram...

Chronogram would be useful. Thanks.


Andrew Stephens
Nikon D40, Nikkor 10.5mm fisheye, Sigma 8mm f3.5 fisheye, Nikkor 18-55/50/35mm  lenses, Nodal Ninja 5 Lite, Agno's Mrotator TCSshort
Nikon P5100, CP5000, CP995, FC-E8, WC-E63,WC-E68, TC-E2, Kaidan Kiwi 995, Bophoto pano bracket
Merlin/Orion panohead + Papywizard on Nokia 770/N800 and Windows XP/2K

Offline

 

#810 2009-01-19 01:08:13

mediavets
Member
From: Isleham, Cambridgeshire, UK.
Registered: 2007-11-14
Posts: 3778
Website

Re: [papywizard v1] Annoncement, feedback, bug report

fma38 wrote:

In fact, we should need just a pulse, then wait stab delay, then another pulse, then wait 'time value' delay. But I don't know what value to put for the pusle; it will depend on cameras, I guess. Si, I put the pulse equal as the delays...

I don't know about cameras, but my gentLED-JUMP IR trigger needs a certain min. duration pulse to activate it.

Last edited by mediavets (2009-01-19 01:09:36)


Andrew Stephens
Nikon D40, Nikkor 10.5mm fisheye, Sigma 8mm f3.5 fisheye, Nikkor 18-55/50/35mm  lenses, Nodal Ninja 5 Lite, Agno's Mrotator TCSshort
Nikon P5100, CP5000, CP995, FC-E8, WC-E63,WC-E68, TC-E2, Kaidan Kiwi 995, Bophoto pano bracket
Merlin/Orion panohead + Papywizard on Nokia 770/N800 and Windows XP/2K

Offline

 

#811 2009-01-19 13:47:08

fma38
Moderator
From: Grenoble, France
Registered: 2005-12-07
Posts: 4842
Website

Re: [papywizard v1] Annoncement, feedback, bug report

What do you think of merging the initial stabilization delay after moving and the mirror-lockup? It think we can immediatly launch the mirror lock-up sequence (if activated), which will be atcivated for that stabilization delay. I don't see any point to wait for the stabilization, then shake again the camera with the mirror, and wait again...

If lockup-mirror is not activated, we just wait the normal stabilization delay... If OK, I can include this in the next minor 1.6.x release...


Frédéric

Canon 20D + 17-40/f4 L USM + 70-200/f4 L USM + 50/f1.4 USM + Tokina 10-17 3.5-4.5 AF DX Fisheye
Merlin/Orion panohead + Papywizard on Nokia N800 and HP TC-1100

Offline

 

#812 2009-01-19 14:19:52

klausesser
Member
From: Düsseldorf, Germany
Registered: 2006-05-22
Posts: 1991
Website

Re: [papywizard v1] Annoncement, feedback, bug report

fma38 wrote:

What do you think of merging the initial stabilization delay after moving and the mirror-lockup? It think we can immediatly launch the mirror lock-up sequence (if activated), which will be atcivated for that stabilization delay. I don't see any point to wait for the stabilization, then shake again the camera with the mirror, and wait again...

???? don´t understand what you mean exactly . .

best, Klaus

Offline

 

#813 2009-01-19 14:46:55

mediavets
Member
From: Isleham, Cambridgeshire, UK.
Registered: 2007-11-14
Posts: 3778
Website

Re: [papywizard v1] Annoncement, feedback, bug report

fma38 wrote:

What do you think of merging the initial stabilization delay after moving and the mirror-lockup? It think we can immediatly launch the mirror lock-up sequence (if activated), which will be atcivated for that stabilization delay. I don't see any point to wait for the stabilization, then shake again the camera with the mirror, and wait again...

If lockup-mirror is not activated, we just wait the normal stabilization delay... If OK, I can include this in the next minor 1.6.x release...

Sounds very sensible to me.


Andrew Stephens
Nikon D40, Nikkor 10.5mm fisheye, Sigma 8mm f3.5 fisheye, Nikkor 18-55/50/35mm  lenses, Nodal Ninja 5 Lite, Agno's Mrotator TCSshort
Nikon P5100, CP5000, CP995, FC-E8, WC-E63,WC-E68, TC-E2, Kaidan Kiwi 995, Bophoto pano bracket
Merlin/Orion panohead + Papywizard on Nokia 770/N800 and Windows XP/2K

Offline

 

#814 2009-01-31 19:52:57

fma38
Moderator
From: Grenoble, France
Registered: 2005-12-07
Posts: 4842
Website

Re: [papywizard v1] Annoncement, feedback, bug report

I updated the branch 1.6 -> 1.6.1. It fixes a few bugs, and really add the new languages: I forgot to include the files in the previous version!!!


Frédéric

Canon 20D + 17-40/f4 L USM + 70-200/f4 L USM + 50/f1.4 USM + Tokina 10-17 3.5-4.5 AF DX Fisheye
Merlin/Orion panohead + Papywizard on Nokia N800 and HP TC-1100

Offline

 

#815 2009-04-12 13:46:06

Paul
Member
From: Bonn, Germany
Registered: 2008-08-30
Posts: 679

Re: [papywizard v1] Annoncement, feedback, bug report

1.6.1 and earlier bug: can't set FL less than 10mm, but my zoom kit is 9-18mm


Paul

close, but no cigar ... ... ...

Online

 

#816 2009-04-12 14:27:16

mediavets
Member
From: Isleham, Cambridgeshire, UK.
Registered: 2007-11-14
Posts: 3778
Website

Re: [papywizard v1] Annoncement, feedback, bug report

Paul wrote:

1.6.1 and earlier bug: can't set FL less than 10mm, but my zoom kit is 9-18mm

Won't matter much in reality will it? Just set a larger overlap?


Andrew Stephens
Nikon D40, Nikkor 10.5mm fisheye, Sigma 8mm f3.5 fisheye, Nikkor 18-55/50/35mm  lenses, Nodal Ninja 5 Lite, Agno's Mrotator TCSshort
Nikon P5100, CP5000, CP995, FC-E8, WC-E63,WC-E68, TC-E2, Kaidan Kiwi 995, Bophoto pano bracket
Merlin/Orion panohead + Papywizard on Nokia 770/N800 and Windows XP/2K

Offline

 

#817 2009-04-12 20:09:48

fma38
Moderator
From: Grenoble, France
Registered: 2005-12-07
Posts: 4842
Website

Re: [papywizard v1] Annoncement, feedback, bug report

Is it a rectilinear lens, or a fisheye?


Frédéric

Canon 20D + 17-40/f4 L USM + 70-200/f4 L USM + 50/f1.4 USM + Tokina 10-17 3.5-4.5 AF DX Fisheye
Merlin/Orion panohead + Papywizard on Nokia N800 and HP TC-1100

Offline

 

#818 2009-04-12 21:30:26

mediavets
Member
From: Isleham, Cambridgeshire, UK.
Registered: 2007-11-14
Posts: 3778
Website

Re: [papywizard v1] Annoncement, feedback, bug report

fma38 wrote:

Is it a rectilinear lens, or a fisheye?

I imagine it is this one - Olympus 9-18mm rectilinear WA zoom:
http://www.dpreview.com/lensreviews/oly … 4-5p6_o20/

Last edited by mediavets (2009-04-12 21:31:24)


Andrew Stephens
Nikon D40, Nikkor 10.5mm fisheye, Sigma 8mm f3.5 fisheye, Nikkor 18-55/50/35mm  lenses, Nodal Ninja 5 Lite, Agno's Mrotator TCSshort
Nikon P5100, CP5000, CP995, FC-E8, WC-E63,WC-E68, TC-E2, Kaidan Kiwi 995, Bophoto pano bracket
Merlin/Orion panohead + Papywizard on Nokia 770/N800 and Windows XP/2K

Offline

 

#819 2009-04-12 23:34:21

Paul
Member
From: Bonn, Germany
Registered: 2008-08-30
Posts: 679

Re: [papywizard v1] Annoncement, feedback, bug report

fma38 wrote:

Is it a rectilinear lens, or a fisheye?

It's the Zuiko Digital 9-19mm rectilinear.


Paul

close, but no cigar ... ... ...

Online

 

#820 2009-08-09 12:29:09

Paul
Member
From: Bonn, Germany
Registered: 2008-08-30
Posts: 679

Re: [papywizard v1] Annoncement, feedback, bug report

3D Simulation not working PW 2.1.10 WinXP32

after a long not using it, i've got this error message today :

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "main3D.py", line 57, in <module>
ImportError: No module named view3D.view3D


Paul

close, but no cigar ... ... ...

Online

 

#821 2009-08-16 00:05:20

fma38
Moderator
From: Grenoble, France
Registered: 2005-12-07
Posts: 4842
Website

Re: [papywizard v1] Annoncement, feedback, bug report

I removed the 3D simulator... Too much things to maintain.


Frédéric

Canon 20D + 17-40/f4 L USM + 70-200/f4 L USM + 50/f1.4 USM + Tokina 10-17 3.5-4.5 AF DX Fisheye
Merlin/Orion panohead + Papywizard on Nokia N800 and HP TC-1100

Offline

 

Board footer

Powered by PunBB
© Copyright 2002–2005 Rickard Andersson